City of York Council

Minutes

 

 

Meeting

SACRE (Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education)

 

Date

30 March 2022 at 6.00pm 

 

Present

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Attendance

 

 

Apologies

Group A

Ian Hodgson

Daryoush Mazloum

 

Group C

Taco Michiels

Andy Tod

 

Group D

Cllr Ian Cuthbertson (Chair)

Cllr Fiona Fitzpatrick

Cllr Sue Hunter

Cllr Martin Rowley [until 6.55pm]

 

Olivia Seymour (Professional RE Advisor)

Maxine Squire (Assistant Director Education and Skills)

 

Penny Coppin-Siddall (Group A)

Ben Rich (Group A)

Kirsty Hollinger (Group B)

Janie Berry (City of York Council Director of Governance)

 

The meeting was not quorate.

 

 

<AI1>

15.           Chair's Announcements

 

The Chair welcomed all to the meeting. He explained that Group Members, Andy Tod (Ralph Butterfield School) and Taco Michiels (Joseph Rowntree School) would be presenting an update on delivering RE in primary school and secondary school.

 

 

 

 

 

</AI1>

<AI2>

16.           Apologies for Absence

 

Apologies for absence were received and accepted for Penny Coppin-Siddall (Group A), Ben Rich (Group A), Kirsty Hollinger (Group B), and Janie Berry (City of York Council Director of Governance).

 

 

</AI2>

<AI3>

17.           Declarations of Interest

 

Cllr Rowley declared a non prejudicial interest in his professional capacity as a Funeral Director who instructed Celebrants and Humanist Celebrants. There were no further declarations of interest.

 

 

</AI3>

<AI4>

18.           Minutes of the meeting on 5 January 2022 and Matters Arising

 

As the meeting was inquorate the approval of the minutes was carried forward to the next meeting on 22 June for approval. It was noted that the minutes would be amended to include Imam Mirazam.

 

Matters Arising

The Chair noted the following matters arising from the meeting held on 5 January:

·        Following the meeting Group D met to give feedback on the self evaluation form. The Chair also met with Cllr Fitzpatrick separately. The Chair thanked Olivia Seymour, Maxine Squire and Ben Rich for their work on this.

·        Member attendance at the Jewish exhibition at the Castle Museum. Ben Rich was thanked for facilitating the visit. Regarding the visit to the exhibition, Olivia Seymour noted that the information on the display boards at the exhibition being available digitally was being explored and it was hoped that videos played at the exhibition would be available as school resources. Daryoush Mazloum noted that this this was being discussed by York Interfaith Group. It was confirmed that the schools’ RE Network dates would be given to Olivia Seymour when finalised.

 

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 5 Jan 2022 be carried forward for approval at the next meeting on 22 June 2022.

 

Reason:     In order that the minutes be approved as an accurate record of the meeting.

 

 

 

 

</AI4>

<AI5>

19.           Member Update - Humanism

 

Using the Humanism UK Core Knowledge Guide as a basis, Ian Hodgson gave an overview of the main aspects of Humanism. Olivia Seymour thanked him for his update and noted that the guide had been a good resource for schools and from page 6 onwards gave a good example of how to teach world views in schools. This was supported by Maxine Squire who welcomed the guide as encouraging independent thought and being useful in schools as part of RE and the wider curriculum.

 

Members thanked Ian Hodgson for his update and in answer to Member questions noted that:

·        With reference to page 12 of the guide on vocabulary for 5-7 year olds in explaining the big bang, he explained how he would teach it a timeline for the natural cause of the universe. (It was noted that he was a former teacher). A Member noted that in Key Stage 1 the guide could help teachers to look at the introduction of non-religious world views.

·        A Group C Member noted that Humanism was discussed through the key stages and came into focus in Key Stage 2.

·        A Member noted that in his profession as a funeral director approximately 85% of clients were non-religious but did not necessarily ascribe to Humanism. Ian Hodgson explained that views across Humanism were not homogenous. Olivia Seymour added that this was part of why the new syllabus had Introduced the language of religion and worldviews and an explanation of organised and individual worldviews

[Cllr Rowley left the meeting at 6.55pm]

 

Teaching RE in Primary School

Andy Tod gave a presentation on teaching RE in primary school. He detailed the Ofsted framework for RE, the nine characteristics of RE and challenges in RE, noting that the RE Today syllabus was very helpful. He noted that the

York schools’ RE network had identified the need for resources in teaching RE.

 

Andy Tod was thanked for his presentation and in response to Member questions explained that:

·        Parental involvement was important and schools worked within the communities they were based. There was also the opportunity to bring parents into school to share their beliefs.

·        The schools RE network had identified that new teachers needed RE training.

 

[The meeting adjourned for a break at 7.02pm and resumed at 7.05pm].

 

Teaching RS in Secondary School

 

Taco Michiels gave a presentation on teaching RE in secondary school. He gave an overview of the good, bad and ugly aspects of this. He was thanked for his presentation and in answer to Member questions noted that:

·        Regarding LGBT and transgender, gender was included in the teaching of citizenship. Maxine Squire added that this was also included in different ways in PSHE, pastoral time and was part of promoting the British value of tolerance.

·        A Member asked if RS having less time in the curriculum had seen less teachers training to be RS teachers. Taco Michiels noted that this different area to area and Maxine Squire added that for the last few years, quotas had been set for subject specialisms. Olivia Seymour noted that there was a national expectation for initial teacher training and one of the roles of SACRE could be to encourage institutions to have quality initial teacher training.

 

Resolved: That Members receive the Member updates.

 

Reason:     In order to be kept up to date on the roles of SACRE Members.

 

 

</AI5>

<AI6>

20.           Ofsted and RE

 

Members had been provided with the NATRE Inspecting RE: An examination of OFSTED inspections paper and information from a York school Ofsted inspection. Maxine Squire explained that inspections were now shorter and she noted the references to RE in the five York schools Ofsted inspections since September 2021. Members were presented with a range of different options for monitoring standards (as detailed in the report by Olivia Seymour in the meeting papers). Olivia Seymour noted that nationally there was an expectation for Church of England schools to teach a range of religions and worldviews.

Members were asked toconsider the role of Ofsted reports in

Monitoring the quality of religious education in York; and to discuss what additional sources of information they would need to effectively discharge their duty to monitor standards in Religious Education. The following points were made during discussion:

·        SACRE needed to regulate how it monitored in RE and a Member asked if SACRE needed a structure for the monitoring of standards. Maxine Squire suggested that SACRE could ask whether curriculum time had been reduced. She was asked if SACRE had the resources to do this and Olivia Seymour suggested that the schools questionnaire could be used.

·        It was suggested that the school survey could be split up and different parts focused on during the year.

·        A Member asked if there could be a mock Ofsted inspection with SACRE taking a sample of what was going on in schools. Olivia Seymour outlined the options York SACRE had develop this.

·        A Member noted that having the meeting in a school had made SACRE come alive and was a move in the right direction.

·        The Chair noted he had attended primary RE network meetings and would be attending secondary network meetings.

·        Concerning the suggestion for a mock Ofsted inspection, the Chair explained that SACRE had limited funds and it would be good do to the mock Ofsted centrally because of the budget. A Member suggested that it would be good to hold the mock Ofsted inspection online.

·        Regarding equipping subject leaders, Olivia Seymour suggested that subject leaders could be trained on deep dive Ofsted inspections and SACRE could look at providing training for this. She added that SACRE needed to find a way of supporting subject leaders and offered to help facilitate Dr Richard Kueh giving a talk to York schools.

 

Resolved: That Members give feedback to the Chair on the points raised.

 

Reason:     To identify what additional sources of information they would need to effectively discharge their duty to monitor standards in Religious Education.

 

 

</AI6>

<AI7>

21.           Monitoring of Standards in RE

 

This was covered as part of the item on Ofsted and RE.

 

 

</AI7>

<AI8>

22.           Correspondence on complaints / determinations

 

It was reported that there had been no complaints to SACRE.

 

Resolved: That Members be updated on complaints.

 

Reason:     In order to be kept updated on complaints to SACRE and

determinations of complaints.

 

 

</AI8>

<AI9>

23.           Dates for future meetings

 

22 June 2022 at 5pm (venue to be confirmed)

 

 

</AI9>

<AI10>

24.           2021-22 Work plan

 

It was agreed that Interfaith Week would be added as an item on the agenda for the 22 June meeting.

 

Resolved: That the work plan be updated to reflect the above change.

 

Reason:     In order to keep the work plan updated.

 

 

</AI10>

<TRAILER_SECTION>

 

 

 

Cllr I Cuthbertson, Chair

[The meeting started at 6.00 pm and finished at 7.30 pm].

</TRAILER_SECTION>

 

<LAYOUT_SECTION>

 

FIELD_SUMMARY

 

 

</LAYOUT_SECTION>

<TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>

 

 

</TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>

<HEADING_LAYOUT_SECTION>

FIELD_TITLE

 

</HEADING_LAYOUT_SECTION>

<TITLED_COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>

FIELD_TITLE

 

 

</ TITLED_COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>

<COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>

FIELD_SUMMARY

 

</ COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>

 

<SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>

2a)  FIELD_TITLE

 

FIELD_SUMMARY

</SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>

 

<TITLE_ONLY_SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>

2b)  FIELD_TITLE

 

</TITLE_ONLY_SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>